summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/cputlb.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>2016-06-20 18:07:05 +0100
committerPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>2016-06-28 18:50:53 +0100
commitd7f30403576f04f1f3a5fb5a1d18cba8dfa7a6d2 (patch)
tree32669ea07c5e5eef4be73601b2fbcac41416a1cd /cputlb.c
parent7dd929dfdc5c52ce79b21bf557ff506e89acbf63 (diff)
downloadqemu-d7f30403576f04f1f3a5fb5a1d18cba8dfa7a6d2.tar.gz
cputlb: don't cpu_abort() if guest tries to execute outside RAM or RAM
In get_page_addr_code(), if the guest program counter turns out not to be in ROM or RAM, we can't handle executing from it, and we call cpu_abort(). This results in the message qemu: fatal: Trying to execute code outside RAM or ROM at 0x08000000 followed by a guest register dump, and then QEMU dumps core. This situation happens in one of two cases: (1) a guest kernel bug, where it jumped off into nowhere (2) a user command line mistake, where they tried to run an image for board A on a QEMU model of board B, or where they didn't provide an image at all, and QEMU executed through a ROM or RAM full of NOP instructions and then fell off the end In either case, a core dump of QEMU itself is entirely useless, and only confuses users into thinking that this is a bug in QEMU rather than a bug in the guest or a problem with their command line. (This is a variation on the general idea that we shouldn't assert() on something the user can accidentally provoke.) Replace the cpu_abort() with something that explains the situation a bit better and exits QEMU without dumping core. (See LP:1062220 for several examples of confused users.) Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Message-id: 1466442425-11885-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Diffstat (limited to 'cputlb.c')
-rw-r--r--cputlb.c39
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/cputlb.c b/cputlb.c
index 23c9b91200..079e4979ca 100644
--- a/cputlb.c
+++ b/cputlb.c
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
#include "exec/ram_addr.h"
#include "exec/exec-all.h"
#include "tcg/tcg.h"
+#include "qemu/error-report.h"
+#include "exec/log.h"
/* DEBUG defines, enable DEBUG_TLB_LOG to log to the CPU_LOG_MMU target */
/* #define DEBUG_TLB */
@@ -427,6 +429,39 @@ void tlb_set_page(CPUState *cpu, target_ulong vaddr,
prot, mmu_idx, size);
}
+static void report_bad_exec(CPUState *cpu, target_ulong addr)
+{
+ /* Accidentally executing outside RAM or ROM is quite common for
+ * several user-error situations, so report it in a way that
+ * makes it clear that this isn't a QEMU bug and provide suggestions
+ * about what a user could do to fix things.
+ */
+ error_report("Trying to execute code outside RAM or ROM at 0x"
+ TARGET_FMT_lx, addr);
+ error_printf("This usually means one of the following happened:\n\n"
+ "(1) You told QEMU to execute a kernel for the wrong machine "
+ "type, and it crashed on startup (eg trying to run a "
+ "raspberry pi kernel on a versatilepb QEMU machine)\n"
+ "(2) You didn't give QEMU a kernel or BIOS filename at all, "
+ "and QEMU executed a ROM full of no-op instructions until "
+ "it fell off the end\n"
+ "(3) Your guest kernel has a bug and crashed by jumping "
+ "off into nowhere\n\n"
+ "This is almost always one of the first two, so check your "
+ "command line and that you are using the right type of kernel "
+ "for this machine.\n"
+ "If you think option (3) is likely then you can try debugging "
+ "your guest with the -d debug options; in particular "
+ "-d guest_errors will cause the log to include a dump of the "
+ "guest register state at this point.\n\n"
+ "Execution cannot continue; stopping here.\n\n");
+
+ /* Report also to the logs, with more detail including register dump */
+ qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "qemu: fatal: Trying to execute code "
+ "outside RAM or ROM at 0x" TARGET_FMT_lx "\n", addr);
+ log_cpu_state_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, cpu, CPU_DUMP_FPU | CPU_DUMP_CCOP);
+}
+
/* NOTE: this function can trigger an exception */
/* NOTE2: the returned address is not exactly the physical address: it
* is actually a ram_addr_t (in system mode; the user mode emulation
@@ -455,8 +490,8 @@ tb_page_addr_t get_page_addr_code(CPUArchState *env1, target_ulong addr)
if (cc->do_unassigned_access) {
cc->do_unassigned_access(cpu, addr, false, true, 0, 4);
} else {
- cpu_abort(cpu, "Trying to execute code outside RAM or ROM at 0x"
- TARGET_FMT_lx "\n", addr);
+ report_bad_exec(cpu, addr);
+ exit(1);
}
}
p = (void *)((uintptr_t)addr + env1->tlb_table[mmu_idx][page_index].addend);