User-mode GDB stub improvements - handle fork

Close gdbserver in child processes, so that only one stub tries to talk
to GDB at a time.  Updated from an earlier patch by Paul Brook.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

git-svn-id: svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/trunk@6095 c046a42c-6fe2-441c-8c8c-71466251a162

2 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/linux-user/main.c b/linux-user/main.c
index 52322d4a7f..238165f454 100644
--- a/linux-user/main.c
+++ b/linux-user/main.c
@@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ void fork_end(int child)
         pthread_cond_init(&exclusive_cond, NULL);
         pthread_cond_init(&exclusive_resume, NULL);
         pthread_mutex_init(&tb_lock, NULL);
+        gdbserver_fork(thread_env);
     } else {
         pthread_mutex_unlock(&exclusive_lock);
         pthread_mutex_unlock(&tb_lock);
@@ -254,6 +255,9 @@ void fork_start(void)
 
 void fork_end(int child)
 {
+    if (child) {
+        gdbserver_fork(thread_env);
+    }
 }
 #endif
 
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
index 73427abb3b..bd60494bcf 100644
--- a/linux-user/syscall.c
+++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
@@ -2960,17 +2960,17 @@ static int do_fork(CPUState *env, unsigned int flags, abi_ulong newsp,
             return -EINVAL;
         fork_start();
         ret = fork();
-#if defined(USE_NPTL)
-        /* There is a race condition here.  The parent process could
-           theoretically read the TID in the child process before the child
-           tid is set.  This would require using either ptrace
-           (not implemented) or having *_tidptr to point at a shared memory
-           mapping.  We can't repeat the spinlock hack used above because
-           the child process gets its own copy of the lock.  */
         if (ret == 0) {
+            /* Child Process.  */
             cpu_clone_regs(env, newsp);
             fork_end(1);
-            /* Child Process.  */
+#if defined(USE_NPTL)
+            /* There is a race condition here.  The parent process could
+               theoretically read the TID in the child process before the child
+               tid is set.  This would require using either ptrace
+               (not implemented) or having *_tidptr to point at a shared memory
+               mapping.  We can't repeat the spinlock hack used above because
+               the child process gets its own copy of the lock.  */
             if (flags & CLONE_CHILD_SETTID)
                 put_user_u32(gettid(), child_tidptr);
             if (flags & CLONE_PARENT_SETTID)
@@ -2979,14 +2979,10 @@ static int do_fork(CPUState *env, unsigned int flags, abi_ulong newsp,
             if (flags & CLONE_SETTLS)
                 cpu_set_tls (env, newtls);
             /* TODO: Implement CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID.  */
+#endif
         } else {
             fork_end(0);
         }
-#else
-        if (ret == 0) {
-            cpu_clone_regs(env, newsp);
-        }
-#endif
     }
     return ret;
 }