summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/scripts
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>2015-12-01 22:20:58 -0700
committerMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>2015-12-17 08:21:29 +0100
commit01cfbaa4c36ecd9f1c7bcbad50c92758e1d147c4 (patch)
tree331acd61966951feca3191ff1aade763056a2b49 /scripts
parent893e1f2c5170d54316f1dcf3fefae679175622fc (diff)
downloadqemu-01cfbaa4c36ecd9f1c7bcbad50c92758e1d147c4.tar.gz
qapi: Move duplicate collision checks to schema check()
With the recent commit 'qapi: Detect collisions in C member names', we have two different locations for detecting clashes - one at parse time, and another at QAPISchema*.check() time. Remove all of the ad hoc parser checks, and delete associated code (for example, the global check_member_clash() method is no longer needed). Testing this showed that the test union-bad-branch wasn't adding much: union-clash-branches also exposes the error message when branches collide, and we've recently fixed things to avoid an implicit collision with max. Likewise, the error for enum-clash-member changes to report our new detection of upper case in a value name, unless we modify the test to use all lower case. The wording of several error messages has changed, but the change is generally an improvement rather than a regression. No change to generated code. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1449033659-25497-15-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts')
-rw-r--r--scripts/qapi.py51
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 50 deletions
diff --git a/scripts/qapi.py b/scripts/qapi.py
index 74a561afda..8edfd79c52 100644
--- a/scripts/qapi.py
+++ b/scripts/qapi.py
@@ -519,21 +519,6 @@ def check_type(expr_info, source, value, allow_array=False,
'enum'])
-def check_member_clash(expr_info, base_name, data, source=""):
- base = find_struct(base_name)
- assert base
- base_members = base['data']
- for key in data.keys():
- if key.startswith('*'):
- key = key[1:]
- if key in base_members or "*" + key in base_members:
- raise QAPIExprError(expr_info,
- "Member name '%s'%s clashes with base '%s'"
- % (key, source, base_name))
- if base.get('base'):
- check_member_clash(expr_info, base['base'], data, source)
-
-
def check_command(expr, expr_info):
name = expr['command']
@@ -563,7 +548,6 @@ def check_union(expr, expr_info):
base = expr.get('base')
discriminator = expr.get('discriminator')
members = expr['data']
- values = {}
# Two types of unions, determined by discriminator.
@@ -610,15 +594,9 @@ def check_union(expr, expr_info):
for (key, value) in members.items():
check_name(expr_info, "Member of union '%s'" % name, key)
- # Each value must name a known type; furthermore, in flat unions,
- # branches must be a struct with no overlapping member names
+ # Each value must name a known type
check_type(expr_info, "Member '%s' of union '%s'" % (key, name),
value, allow_array=not base, allow_metas=allow_metas)
- if base:
- branch_struct = find_struct(value)
- assert branch_struct
- check_member_clash(expr_info, base, branch_struct['data'],
- " of branch '%s'" % key)
# If the discriminator names an enum type, then all members
# of 'data' must also be members of the enum type.
@@ -629,34 +607,16 @@ def check_union(expr, expr_info):
"enum '%s'" %
(key, enum_define["enum_name"]))
- # Otherwise, check for conflicts in the generated enum
- else:
- c_key = camel_to_upper(key)
- if c_key in values:
- raise QAPIExprError(expr_info,
- "Union '%s' member '%s' clashes with '%s'"
- % (name, key, values[c_key]))
- values[c_key] = key
-
def check_alternate(expr, expr_info):
name = expr['alternate']
members = expr['data']
- values = {}
types_seen = {}
# Check every branch
for (key, value) in members.items():
check_name(expr_info, "Member of alternate '%s'" % name, key)
- # Check for conflicts in the branch names
- c_key = c_name(key)
- if c_key in values:
- raise QAPIExprError(expr_info,
- "Alternate '%s' member '%s' clashes with '%s'"
- % (name, key, values[c_key]))
- values[c_key] = key
-
# Ensure alternates have no type conflicts.
check_type(expr_info, "Member '%s' of alternate '%s'" % (key, name),
value,
@@ -675,7 +635,6 @@ def check_enum(expr, expr_info):
name = expr['enum']
members = expr.get('data')
prefix = expr.get('prefix')
- values = {}
if not isinstance(members, list):
raise QAPIExprError(expr_info,
@@ -686,12 +645,6 @@ def check_enum(expr, expr_info):
for member in members:
check_name(expr_info, "Member of enum '%s'" % name, member,
enum_member=True)
- key = camel_to_upper(member)
- if key in values:
- raise QAPIExprError(expr_info,
- "Enum '%s' member '%s' clashes with '%s'"
- % (name, member, values[key]))
- values[key] = member
def check_struct(expr, expr_info):
@@ -702,8 +655,6 @@ def check_struct(expr, expr_info):
allow_dict=True, allow_optional=True)
check_type(expr_info, "'base' for struct '%s'" % name, expr.get('base'),
allow_metas=['struct'])
- if expr.get('base'):
- check_member_clash(expr_info, expr['base'], expr['data'])
def check_keys(expr_elem, meta, required, optional=[]):