summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ioport-user.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2009-07-16ioport: use uint{32, 16, 8}_t for ioport value and pio_addr_t for ioport ↵Isaku Yamahata1-12/+15
address. Using int for cpu_{in, out}[bwl] is inconsistent with other part because for address or value, uintN_t is used by other qemu part. At least, softmmu, CPU{Read, Write}MemoryFunc, pci, target_phys_addr_t and the callers of cpu_{in, out}[bwl](). This patch removes the inconsistency. IO port has its own address space so define pio_addr_t as uint32_t because PCI io space width is 32bit. And use uint{32, 16, 8}_t for ioport value. Changing signedness of value might cause subtle issue. However only a suspicious caller is kvm_handle_io() which is ok. And other callers pass unsigned value in the first place. Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp> Cc: Stuart Brady <sdbrady@ntlworld.com> Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> Cc: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> Cc: Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
2009-07-16Update to a hopefully more future proof FSF addressBlue Swirl1-3/+1
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
2009-07-09consolidate user cpu_{in, out}[bwl] into ioport-user.cIsaku Yamahata1-0/+59
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>