summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-03-27coroutine: avoid co_queue_wakeup recursionStefan Hajnoczi1-34/+0
qemu_aio_coroutine_enter() is (indirectly) called recursively when processing co_queue_wakeup. This can lead to stack exhaustion. This patch rewrites co_queue_wakeup in an iterative fashion (instead of recursive) with bounded memory usage to prevent stack exhaustion. qemu_co_queue_run_restart() is inlined into qemu_aio_coroutine_enter() and the qemu_coroutine_enter() call is turned into a loop to avoid recursion. There is one change that is worth mentioning: Previously, when coroutine A queued coroutine B, qemu_co_queue_run_restart() entered coroutine B from coroutine A. If A was terminating then it would still stay alive until B yielded. After this patch B is entered by A's parent so that a A can be deleted immediately if it is terminating. It is safe to make this change since B could never interact with A if it was terminating anyway. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Message-id: 20180322152834.12656-3-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2018-02-15misc: fix spellingMarc-André Lureau1-1/+1
s/pupulate/populate Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Message-id: 20180208162447.10851-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2018-02-08coroutine-lock: make qemu_co_enter_next thread-safePaolo Bonzini1-2/+8
qemu_co_queue_next does not need to release and re-acquire the mutex, because the queued coroutine does not run immediately. However, this does not hold for qemu_co_enter_next. Now that qemu_co_queue_wait can synchronize (via QemuLockable) with code that is not running in coroutine context, it's important that code using qemu_co_enter_next can easily use a standardized locking idiom. First of all, qemu_co_enter_next must use aio_co_wake to restart the coroutine. Second, the function gains a second argument, a QemuLockable*, and the comments of qemu_co_queue_next and qemu_co_queue_restart_all are adjusted to clarify the difference. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180203153935.8056-5-pbonzini@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
2018-02-08coroutine-lock: convert CoQueue to use QemuLockablePaolo Bonzini1-5/+7
There are cases in which a queued coroutine must be restarted from non-coroutine context (with qemu_co_enter_next). In this cases, qemu_co_enter_next also needs to be thread-safe, but it cannot use a CoMutex and so cannot qemu_co_queue_wait. Use QemuLockable so that the CoQueue can interchangeably use CoMutex or QemuMutex. Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20180203153935.8056-4-pbonzini@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
2017-07-17coroutine-lock: add qemu_co_rwlock_downgrade and qemu_co_rwlock_upgradePaolo Bonzini1-0/+35
These functions are more efficient in the presence of contention. qemu_co_rwlock_downgrade also guarantees not to block, which may be useful in some algorithms too. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20170629132749.997-3-pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
2017-06-07coroutine-lock: do not touch coroutine after another one has been enteredRoman Pen1-2/+17
Submission of requests on linux aio is a bit tricky and can lead to requests completions on submission path: 44713c9e8547 ("linux-aio: Handle io_submit() failure gracefully") 0ed93d84edab ("linux-aio: process completions from ioq_submit()") That means that any coroutine which has been yielded in order to wait for completion can be resumed from submission path and be eventually terminated (freed). The following use-after-free crash was observed when IO throttling was enabled: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7f5813dff700 (LWP 56417)] virtqueue_unmap_sg (elem=0x7f5804009a30, len=1, vq=<optimized out>) at virtio.c:252 (gdb) bt #0 virtqueue_unmap_sg (elem=0x7f5804009a30, len=1, vq=<optimized out>) at virtio.c:252 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ remember the address #1 virtqueue_fill (vq=0x5598b20d21b0, elem=0x7f5804009a30, len=1, idx=0) at virtio.c:282 #2 virtqueue_push (vq=0x5598b20d21b0, elem=elem@entry=0x7f5804009a30, len=<optimized out>) at virtio.c:308 #3 virtio_blk_req_complete (req=req@entry=0x7f5804009a30, status=status@entry=0 '\000') at virtio-blk.c:61 #4 virtio_blk_rw_complete (opaque=<optimized out>, ret=0) at virtio-blk.c:126 #5 blk_aio_complete (acb=0x7f58040068d0) at block-backend.c:923 #6 coroutine_trampoline (i0=<optimized out>, i1=<optimized out>) at coroutine-ucontext.c:78 (gdb) p * elem $8 = {index = 77, out_num = 2, in_num = 1, in_addr = 0x7f5804009ad8, out_addr = 0x7f5804009ae0, in_sg = 0x0, out_sg = 0x7f5804009a50} ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 'in_sg' and 'out_sg' are invalid. e.g. it is impossible that 'in_sg' is zero, instead its value must be equal to: (gdb) p/x 0x7f5804009ad8 + sizeof(elem->in_addr[0]) + 2 * sizeof(elem->out_addr[0]) $26 = 0x7f5804009af0 Seems 'elem' was corrupted. Meanwhile another thread raised an abort: Thread 12 (Thread 0x7f57f2ffd700 (LWP 56426)): #0 raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #1 abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #2 qemu_coroutine_enter (co=0x7f5804009af0) at qemu-coroutine.c:113 #3 qemu_co_queue_run_restart (co=0x7f5804009a30) at qemu-coroutine-lock.c:60 #4 qemu_coroutine_enter (co=0x7f5804009a30) at qemu-coroutine.c:119 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ WTF?? this is equal to elem from crashed thread #5 qemu_co_queue_run_restart (co=0x7f57e7f16ae0) at qemu-coroutine-lock.c:60 #6 qemu_coroutine_enter (co=0x7f57e7f16ae0) at qemu-coroutine.c:119 #7 qemu_co_queue_run_restart (co=0x7f5807e112a0) at qemu-coroutine-lock.c:60 #8 qemu_coroutine_enter (co=0x7f5807e112a0) at qemu-coroutine.c:119 #9 qemu_co_queue_run_restart (co=0x7f5807f17820) at qemu-coroutine-lock.c:60 #10 qemu_coroutine_enter (co=0x7f5807f17820) at qemu-coroutine.c:119 #11 qemu_co_queue_run_restart (co=0x7f57e7f18e10) at qemu-coroutine-lock.c:60 #12 qemu_coroutine_enter (co=0x7f57e7f18e10) at qemu-coroutine.c:119 #13 qemu_co_enter_next (queue=queue@entry=0x5598b1e742d0) at qemu-coroutine-lock.c:106 #14 timer_cb (blk=0x5598b1e74280, is_write=<optimized out>) at throttle-groups.c:419 Crash can be explained by access of 'co' object from the loop inside qemu_co_queue_run_restart(): while ((next = QSIMPLEQ_FIRST(&co->co_queue_wakeup))) { QSIMPLEQ_REMOVE_HEAD(&co->co_queue_wakeup, co_queue_next); ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ on each iteration 'co' is accessed, but 'co' can be already freed qemu_coroutine_enter(next); } When 'next' coroutine is resumed (entered) it can in its turn resume 'co', and eventually free it. That's why we see 'co' (which was freed) has the same address as 'elem' from the first backtrace. The fix is obvious: use temporary queue and do not touch coroutine after first qemu_coroutine_enter() is invoked. The issue is quite rare and happens every ~12 hours on very high IO and CPU load (building linux kernel with -j512 inside guest) when IO throttling is enabled. With the fix applied guest is running ~35 hours and is still alive so far. Signed-off-by: Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Message-id: 20170601160847.23720-1-roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2017-02-21coroutine-lock: make CoRwlock thread-safe and fairPaolo Bonzini1-11/+24
This adds a CoMutex around the existing CoQueue. Because the write-side can just take CoMutex, the old "writer" field is not necessary anymore. Instead of removing it altogether, count the number of pending writers during a read-side critical section and forbid further readers from entering. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Message-id: 20170213181244.16297-7-pbonzini@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2017-02-21coroutine-lock: add mutex argument to CoQueue APIsPaolo Bonzini1-3/+21
All that CoQueue needs in order to become thread-safe is help from an external mutex. Add this to the API. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Message-id: 20170213181244.16297-6-pbonzini@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2017-02-21coroutine-lock: add limited spinning to CoMutexPaolo Bonzini1-6/+45
Running a very small critical section on pthread_mutex_t and CoMutex shows that pthread_mutex_t is much faster because it doesn't actually go to sleep. What happens is that the critical section is shorter than the latency of entering the kernel and thus FUTEX_WAIT always fails. With CoMutex there is no such latency but you still want to avoid wait and wakeup. So introduce it artificially. This only works with one waiters; because CoMutex is fair, it will always have more waits and wakeups than a pthread_mutex_t. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Message-id: 20170213181244.16297-3-pbonzini@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2017-02-21coroutine-lock: make CoMutex thread-safePaolo Bonzini1-10/+143
This uses the lock-free mutex described in the paper '"Blocking without Locking", or LFTHREADS: A lock-free thread library' by Gidenstam and Papatriantafilou. The same technique is used in OSv, and in fact the code is essentially a conversion to C of OSv's code. [Added missing coroutine_fn in tests/test-aio-multithread.c. --Stefan] Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Message-id: 20170213181244.16297-2-pbonzini@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2017-02-21coroutine-lock: reschedule coroutine on the AioContext it was running onPaolo Bonzini1-3/+2
As a small step towards the introduction of multiqueue, we want coroutines to remain on the same AioContext that started them, unless they are moved explicitly with e.g. aio_co_schedule. This patch avoids that coroutines switch AioContext when they use a CoMutex. For now it does not make much of a difference, because the CoMutex is not thread-safe and the AioContext itself is used to protect the CoMutex from concurrent access. However, this is going to change. Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Message-id: 20170213135235.12274-9-pbonzini@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2016-09-05coroutine: Assert that no locks are held on terminationKevin Wolf1-0/+11
A coroutine that takes a lock must also release it again. If the coroutine terminates without having released all its locks, it's buggy and we'll probably run into a deadlock sooner or later. Make sure that we don't get such cases. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2016-09-05coroutine: Let CoMutex remember who holds itKevin Wolf1-0/+3
In cases of deadlocks, knowing who holds a given CoMutex is really helpful for debugging. Keeping the information around doesn't cost much and allows us to add another assertion to keep the code correct, so let's just add it. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2016-07-13coroutine: move entry argument to qemu_coroutine_createPaolo Bonzini1-2/+2
In practice the entry argument is always known at creation time, and it is confusing that sometimes qemu_coroutine_enter is used with a non-NULL argument to re-enter a coroutine (this happens in block/sheepdog.c and tests/test-coroutine.c). So pass the opaque value at creation time, for consistency with e.g. aio_bh_new. Mostly done with the following semantic patch: @ entry1 @ expression entry, arg, co; @@ - co = qemu_coroutine_create(entry); + co = qemu_coroutine_create(entry, arg); ... - qemu_coroutine_enter(co, arg); + qemu_coroutine_enter(co); @ entry2 @ expression entry, arg; identifier co; @@ - Coroutine *co = qemu_coroutine_create(entry); + Coroutine *co = qemu_coroutine_create(entry, arg); ... - qemu_coroutine_enter(co, arg); + qemu_coroutine_enter(co); @ entry3 @ expression entry, arg; @@ - qemu_coroutine_enter(qemu_coroutine_create(entry), arg); + qemu_coroutine_enter(qemu_coroutine_create(entry, arg)); @ reentry @ expression co; @@ - qemu_coroutine_enter(co, NULL); + qemu_coroutine_enter(co); except for the aforementioned few places where the semantic patch stumbled (as expected) and for test_co_queue, which would otherwise produce an uninitialized variable warning. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2016-07-13coroutine: use QSIMPLEQ instead of QTAILQPaolo Bonzini1-11/+11
CoQueue do not need to remove any element but the head of the list; processing is always strictly FIFO. Therefore, the simpler singly-linked QSIMPLEQ can be used instead. Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2016-02-04util: Clean up includesPeter Maydell1-0/+1
Clean up includes so that osdep.h is included first and headers which it implies are not included manually. This commit was created with scripts/clean-includes. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Message-id: 1454089805-5470-6-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2015-10-20coroutine: move into libqemuutil.a libraryDaniel P. Berrange1-0/+186
The coroutine files are currently referenced by the block-obj-y variable. The coroutine functionality though is already used by more than just the block code. eg migration code uses coroutine yield. In the future the I/O channel code will also use the coroutine yield functionality. Since the coroutine code is nicely self-contained it can be easily built as part of the libqemuutil.a library, making it widely available. The headers are also moved into include/qemu, instead of the include/block directory, since they are now part of the util codebase, and the impl was never in the block/ directory either. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>