From 9bda456e419273199221625894003bf9307d8451 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergey Fedorov Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 18:46:44 +0300 Subject: doc/rcu: fix g_free_rcu() usage example The first argument of g_free_rcu() is a pointer to a structure. But foo_reclaim is used as a function name in the previous example along with &foo as a pointer to the structure being reclaimed. Make the example consistent with the previous one. Signed-off-by: Sergey Fedorov Message-Id: <1444837604-13712-1-git-send-email-serge.fdrv@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- docs/rcu.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'docs') diff --git a/docs/rcu.txt b/docs/rcu.txt index 21ecb8106c..2f70954e82 100644 --- a/docs/rcu.txt +++ b/docs/rcu.txt @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ The core RCU API is small: the callback function is g_free, in particular, g_free_rcu can be used. In the above case, one could have written simply: - g_free_rcu(foo_reclaim, rcu); + g_free_rcu(&foo, rcu); typeof(*p) atomic_rcu_read(p); -- cgit v1.2.1