From aaa2064c2ae25ef833b3324aedeba9a6363bd5ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Juan Quintela Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:35:24 +0100 Subject: ram: ram_discard_range() don't use the mis parameter Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela Reviewed-by: Peter Xu --- migration/postcopy-ram.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'migration/postcopy-ram.c') diff --git a/migration/postcopy-ram.c b/migration/postcopy-ram.c index 8756364051..85fd8d72b3 100644 --- a/migration/postcopy-ram.c +++ b/migration/postcopy-ram.c @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ out: static int init_range(const char *block_name, void *host_addr, ram_addr_t offset, ram_addr_t length, void *opaque) { - MigrationIncomingState *mis = opaque; - trace_postcopy_init_range(block_name, host_addr, offset, length); /* @@ -223,7 +221,7 @@ static int init_range(const char *block_name, void *host_addr, * - we're going to get the copy from the source anyway. * (Precopy will just overwrite this data, so doesn't need the discard) */ - if (ram_discard_range(mis, block_name, 0, length)) { + if (ram_discard_range(block_name, 0, length)) { return -1; } @@ -271,7 +269,7 @@ static int cleanup_range(const char *block_name, void *host_addr, */ int postcopy_ram_incoming_init(MigrationIncomingState *mis, size_t ram_pages) { - if (qemu_ram_foreach_block(init_range, mis)) { + if (qemu_ram_foreach_block(init_range, NULL)) { return -1; } -- cgit v1.2.1