From b5f1aa64442409cca7a146f34fc0fd53ac8a3527 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Henderson Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:19:28 -0700 Subject: target-alpha: Tidy up arithmetic exceptions. Introduce and use arith_excp, filling in the trap_arg[01] IPRs. Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson --- target-alpha/op_helper.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) (limited to 'target-alpha') diff --git a/target-alpha/op_helper.c b/target-alpha/op_helper.c index 73e580583c..672940ee2c 100644 --- a/target-alpha/op_helper.c +++ b/target-alpha/op_helper.c @@ -32,6 +32,15 @@ void QEMU_NORETURN helper_excp (int excp, int error) cpu_loop_exit(); } +static void QEMU_NORETURN arith_excp(int exc, uint64_t mask) +{ + env->exception_index = EXCP_ARITH; + env->error_code = 0; + env->trap_arg0 = exc; + env->trap_arg1 = mask; + cpu_loop_exit(); +} + uint64_t helper_load_pcc (void) { /* ??? This isn't a timer for which we have any rate info. */ @@ -53,7 +62,7 @@ uint64_t helper_addqv (uint64_t op1, uint64_t op2) uint64_t tmp = op1; op1 += op2; if (unlikely((tmp ^ op2 ^ (-1ULL)) & (tmp ^ op1) & (1ULL << 63))) { - helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXC_M_IOV); + arith_excp(EXC_M_IOV, 0); } return op1; } @@ -63,7 +72,7 @@ uint64_t helper_addlv (uint64_t op1, uint64_t op2) uint64_t tmp = op1; op1 = (uint32_t)(op1 + op2); if (unlikely((tmp ^ op2 ^ (-1UL)) & (tmp ^ op1) & (1UL << 31))) { - helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXC_M_IOV); + arith_excp(EXC_M_IOV, 0); } return op1; } @@ -73,7 +82,7 @@ uint64_t helper_subqv (uint64_t op1, uint64_t op2) uint64_t res; res = op1 - op2; if (unlikely((op1 ^ op2) & (res ^ op1) & (1ULL << 63))) { - helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXC_M_IOV); + arith_excp(EXC_M_IOV, 0); } return res; } @@ -83,7 +92,7 @@ uint64_t helper_sublv (uint64_t op1, uint64_t op2) uint32_t res; res = op1 - op2; if (unlikely((op1 ^ op2) & (res ^ op1) & (1UL << 31))) { - helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXC_M_IOV); + arith_excp(EXC_M_IOV, 0); } return res; } @@ -93,7 +102,7 @@ uint64_t helper_mullv (uint64_t op1, uint64_t op2) int64_t res = (int64_t)op1 * (int64_t)op2; if (unlikely((int32_t)res != res)) { - helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXC_M_IOV); + arith_excp(EXC_M_IOV, 0); } return (int64_t)((int32_t)res); } @@ -105,7 +114,7 @@ uint64_t helper_mulqv (uint64_t op1, uint64_t op2) muls64(&tl, &th, op1, op2); /* If th != 0 && th != -1, then we had an overflow */ if (unlikely((th + 1) > 1)) { - helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXC_M_IOV); + arith_excp(EXC_M_IOV, 0); } return tl; } @@ -373,8 +382,6 @@ void helper_fp_exc_raise(uint32_t exc, uint32_t regno) if (exc) { uint32_t hw_exc = 0; - env->trap_arg1 = 1ull << regno; - if (exc & float_flag_invalid) { hw_exc |= EXC_M_INV; } @@ -390,7 +397,8 @@ void helper_fp_exc_raise(uint32_t exc, uint32_t regno) if (exc & float_flag_inexact) { hw_exc |= EXC_M_INE; } - helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, hw_exc); + + arith_excp(hw_exc, 1ull << regno); } } @@ -420,7 +428,7 @@ uint64_t helper_ieee_input(uint64_t val) if (env->fpcr_dnz) { val &= 1ull << 63; } else { - helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXC_M_UNF); + arith_excp(EXC_M_UNF, 0); } } } else if (exp == 0x7ff) { @@ -428,7 +436,7 @@ uint64_t helper_ieee_input(uint64_t val) /* ??? I'm not sure these exception bit flags are correct. I do know that the Linux kernel, at least, doesn't rely on them and just emulates the insn to figure out what exception to use. */ - helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, frac ? EXC_M_INV : EXC_M_FOV); + arith_excp(frac ? EXC_M_INV : EXC_M_FOV, 0); } return val; } @@ -445,12 +453,12 @@ uint64_t helper_ieee_input_cmp(uint64_t val) if (env->fpcr_dnz) { val &= 1ull << 63; } else { - helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXC_M_UNF); + arith_excp(EXC_M_UNF, 0); } } } else if (exp == 0x7ff && frac) { /* NaN. */ - helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXC_M_INV); + arith_excp(EXC_M_INV, 0); } return val; } -- cgit v1.2.1