summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/block/replication.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>2017-07-07 07:44:59 -0500
committerKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>2017-07-10 13:18:07 +0200
commit51b0a488882328f8f02519bb47ca7e0e7fbe12ff (patch)
tree36257cf2221ea7e4e54ab7deae446d02c46f326c /block/replication.c
parentc00716beb30ba996bd6fdfd5f41bb07e4414144f (diff)
downloadqemu-51b0a488882328f8f02519bb47ca7e0e7fbe12ff.tar.gz
block: Make bdrv_is_allocated_above() byte-based
We are gradually moving away from sector-based interfaces, towards byte-based. In the common case, allocation is unlikely to ever use values that are not naturally sector-aligned, but it is possible that byte-based values will let us be more precise about allocation at the end of an unaligned file that can do byte-based access. Changing the signature of the function to use int64_t *pnum ensures that the compiler enforces that all callers are updated. For now, the io.c layer still assert()s that all callers are sector-aligned, but that can be relaxed when a later patch implements byte-based block status. Therefore, for the most part this patch is just the addition of scaling at the callers followed by inverse scaling at bdrv_is_allocated(). But some code, particularly stream_run(), gets a lot simpler because it no longer has to mess with sectors. Leave comments where we can further simplify by switching to byte-based iterations, once later patches eliminate the need for sector-aligned operations. For ease of review, bdrv_is_allocated() was tackled separately. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'block/replication.c')
-rw-r--r--block/replication.c17
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/block/replication.c b/block/replication.c
index 8f3aba7a20..bf4462c8e7 100644
--- a/block/replication.c
+++ b/block/replication.c
@@ -264,7 +264,8 @@ static coroutine_fn int replication_co_writev(BlockDriverState *bs,
BdrvChild *top = bs->file;
BdrvChild *base = s->secondary_disk;
BdrvChild *target;
- int ret, n;
+ int ret;
+ int64_t n;
ret = replication_get_io_status(s);
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -283,14 +284,20 @@ static coroutine_fn int replication_co_writev(BlockDriverState *bs,
*/
qemu_iovec_init(&hd_qiov, qiov->niov);
while (remaining_sectors > 0) {
- ret = bdrv_is_allocated_above(top->bs, base->bs, sector_num,
- remaining_sectors, &n);
+ int64_t count;
+
+ ret = bdrv_is_allocated_above(top->bs, base->bs,
+ sector_num * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE,
+ remaining_sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE,
+ &count);
if (ret < 0) {
goto out1;
}
+ assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(count, BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE));
+ n = count >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
qemu_iovec_reset(&hd_qiov);
- qemu_iovec_concat(&hd_qiov, qiov, bytes_done, n * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
+ qemu_iovec_concat(&hd_qiov, qiov, bytes_done, count);
target = ret ? top : base;
ret = bdrv_co_writev(target, sector_num, n, &hd_qiov);
@@ -300,7 +307,7 @@ static coroutine_fn int replication_co_writev(BlockDriverState *bs,
remaining_sectors -= n;
sector_num += n;
- bytes_done += n * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
+ bytes_done += count;
}
out1: