summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/qapi/string-output-visitor.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>2016-01-29 06:48:50 -0700
committerMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>2016-02-08 17:29:55 +0100
commitf755dea79dc81b0d6a8f6414e0672e165e28d8ba (patch)
tree9c52a92cc5e594d3d8fac4ba873974f629c0ece3 /qapi/string-output-visitor.c
parent4c40314a35816de635e7170eaacdc0c35be83a8a (diff)
downloadqemu-f755dea79dc81b0d6a8f6414e0672e165e28d8ba.tar.gz
qapi: Make all visitors supply uint64 callbacks
Our qapi visitor contract supports multiple integer visitors, but left the type_uint64 visitor as optional (falling back on type_int64); which in turn can lead to awkward behavior with numbers larger than INT64_MAX (the user has to be aware of twos complement, and deal with negatives). This patch does not address the disparity in handling large values as negatives. It merely moves the fallback from uint64 to int64 from the visitor core to the visitors, where the issue can actually be fixed, by implementing the missing type_uint64() callbacks on top of the respective type_int64() callbacks, and with a FIXME comment explaining why that's wrong. With that done, we now have a type_uint64() callback in every driver, so we can make it mandatory from the core. And although the type_int64() callback can cover the entire valid range of type_uint{8,16,32} on valid user input, using type_uint64() to avoid mixed signedness makes more sense. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1454075341-13658-15-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'qapi/string-output-visitor.c')
-rw-r--r--qapi/string-output-visitor.c9
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/qapi/string-output-visitor.c b/qapi/string-output-visitor.c
index cf8dfc8b48..8400c8beeb 100644
--- a/qapi/string-output-visitor.c
+++ b/qapi/string-output-visitor.c
@@ -198,6 +198,14 @@ static void print_type_int64(Visitor *v, int64_t *obj, const char *name,
}
}
+static void print_type_uint64(Visitor *v, uint64_t *obj, const char *name,
+ Error **errp)
+{
+ /* FIXME: print_type_int64 mishandles values over INT64_MAX */
+ int64_t i = *obj;
+ print_type_int64(v, &i, name, errp);
+}
+
static void print_type_size(Visitor *v, uint64_t *obj, const char *name,
Error **errp)
{
@@ -347,6 +355,7 @@ StringOutputVisitor *string_output_visitor_new(bool human)
v->human = human;
v->visitor.type_enum = output_type_enum;
v->visitor.type_int64 = print_type_int64;
+ v->visitor.type_uint64 = print_type_uint64;
v->visitor.type_size = print_type_size;
v->visitor.type_bool = print_type_bool;
v->visitor.type_str = print_type_str;